von acanaceous » Do, 21.12.2023 10:04
I think the decision of the Austrian Supreme Court to reject the wave of warnings against website operators who use Google Fonts is a sensible and fair one. The court ruled that the use of Google Fonts does not violate the GDPR, as it does not involve the transmission of personal data to Google, and that the warnings were abusive and unjustified.
I agree with the court's reasoning, as I believe that Google Fonts is a useful and harmless service that enhances the design and functionality of websites. Google Fonts does not collect or store any personal data from website visitors, such as IP addresses, cookies, or device identifiers. Google Fonts only provides fonts to websites via a content delivery network (CDN
geometry dash), which is a common and legitimate practice on the internet. Google Fonts also respects the privacy settings of the browsers, such as the "Do Not Track" option, and does not use any tracking or advertising technologies
I think the decision of the Austrian Supreme Court to reject the wave of warnings against website operators who use Google Fonts is a sensible and fair one. The court ruled that the use of Google Fonts does not violate the GDPR, as it does not involve the transmission of personal data to Google, and that the warnings were abusive and unjustified.
I agree with the court's reasoning, as I believe that Google Fonts is a useful and harmless service that enhances the design and functionality of websites. Google Fonts does not collect or store any personal data from website visitors, such as IP addresses, cookies, or device identifiers. Google Fonts only provides fonts to websites via a content delivery network (CDN[size=1][url=https://geometrydash-free.com][color=#FFFFFF]geometry dash[/color][/url][/size]), which is a common and legitimate practice on the internet. Google Fonts also respects the privacy settings of the browsers, such as the "Do Not Track" option, and does not use any tracking or advertising technologies